Talk:Bernard Schwartz House
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 8 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was Withdrawing.. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bernard Schwartz House. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715191339/http://www.roadstraveled.com/wisconsin_travel/Roads_Traveled,_Wisconsin_Vacation_Travel_Columns_by_Mary_Bergin/Entries/2005/11/12_Stay_overnight_in_a_Frank_Lloyd_Wright_house.html to http://www.roadstraveled.com/wisconsin_travel/Roads_Traveled,_Wisconsin_Vacation_Travel_Columns_by_Mary_Bergin/Entries/2005/11/12_Stay_overnight_in_a_Frank_Lloyd_Wright_house.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:21, 31 October 2016 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit
- ... that the Bernard Schwartz House's design was based on a drawing for a magazine? Source: Umberger, Mary (December 16, 2000). "Wright House Needs a Buyer With Bucks, Speed". Chicago Tribune.
- ALT1: ... that the Bernard Schwartz House was built after Schwartz saw a plan by Frank Lloyd Wright in Life magazine? Source: Schwartz, Bernard and Fern, House (Report). National Register of Historic Places, National Park Service. February 19, 2019. p. 19
- ALT2: ... that the Bernard Schwartz House was Wisconsin's most popular Airbnb listing by the late 2010s? Source: Nyman, Shane (June 3, 2019). "Most popular Airbnb in Wisconsin is Frank Lloyd Wright house in Two Rivers". Post-Crescent Media
- ALT3: ... that Frank Lloyd Wright did not believe Wisconsin's Bernard Schwartz House would need repairs or catch fire? Source: National Park Service 2019, p. 27.
- ALT4: ... that the designer of Wisconsin's Bernard Schwartz House did not believe it would need repairs or catch fire? Source: National Park Service 2019, p. 27.
- ALT5: ... that the children of the Bernard Schwartz House's owner often invited strangers to see their home? Source: Sundberg, Anne (June 13, 2004). "Open and they will visit". Herald Times Reporter. pp. F1, F2.
- Reviewed: Alice Lord (diver) (1st of 2 QPQs)
- Comment: More hook suggestions welcomed
Epicgenius (talk) 15:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC).
- QPQ is done. Article is in good shape, neutral, BLP-compliant; sources in general look reasonable. Length is good. Hook length is good, and hook statement is properly cited. 15X expansion is recent enough. Earwig says 46% similarity to the NHRP report, which is a little high but is explained by the many direct quotes and common phrases. (I decline to read that document in full, as it is a 73-page PDF.) I like ALT1, although I'd prefer that "its first owner" be instead "Schwartz". Epicgenius, you good with that? DS (talk) 16:31, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
- DS, thanks for the review. That change to the hook sounds good to me and I have implemented it. Epicgenius (talk) 16:39, 28 March 2025 (UTC)